|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome to the Auldenfire Sweden Object Management Group (OMG™) resource page. Here you will find information and links to the OMG web site related to areas that are of special importance to our Enterprise Systems Architecture Laboratory (ESAL). The Auldenfire Group of companies are active participants in defining international standards and the OMG is one of the standards bodies that we are committed to. Our focus within the OMG is primarily concerned with the establishment of Enterprise Architectural standards with a concentration in Integration Services. Specific OMG initiatives that we feel are critical to this process include:
Auldenfire Sweden AB is currently working on the following OMG initiatives:
Additional information can be found at the Object Management Group web site at the following links:
Auldenfire Sweden AB is a Platform voting member of the OMG.
Auldenfire Sweden AB is committed to developing domain independent enterprise architectural solutions, methodologies, and automation tools. Our Technology Assessment laboratory focuses on evaluating how Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) products and tools can be adapted for enterprise architecture solutions. By leveraging COTS solutions with our own internally developed solutions, we can focus on developing a more robust enterprise architecture development environment that reduces cost, leverages existing technology, and accelerates the development life-cycle. OMG® Legal Notice: OMG
marks and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks, service marks
and/or certification marks of Object Management Group, Inc. registered
in the United States. Common Warehouse Metamodel Meta Interchange Patterns This RFP requests proposals that specify metadata interchange patterns
that support and conform to CWM (Common Warehouse Metamodel). The specific
objectives of this RFP are the following: Establish an industry standard
specification for CWM metadata interchange patterns. Leverage the CWM
Specification and existing CWM metadata interchange mechanisms. A complete
specification of the syntax and semantics of typical CWM metadata interchange
patterns. The CWM Web Services RFP (ad/2001-04-12) has a dependency on
this RFP. Auldenfire Sweden AB Contact Person: Common Warehouse Metamodel Web Services This RFP requests proposals that provide Web services for metadata interchange
that support and conform to CWM (Common Warehouse Metamodel). The specific
objectives of this RFP are the following: Establish an industry standard
specification for CWM Web services. Specify generic mechanisms that can
be used to interchange CWM metadata over the Web. Leverage the CWM Specification
and existing CWM metadata interchange mechanisms. This RFP solicits proposals
for the following: A complete specification of the syntax and semantics
of standard CWM metadata interchange (request-response) protocols that
is based on typical CWM metadata interchange patterns. A complete specification
of the syntax and semantics of CWM Web services API that allow loosely-coupled
interchange of CWM metadata over the Web and that is based on the standard
CWM metadata interchange protocols. This RFP depends on the CWM Metadata
Interchange Patterns RFP (ad/2001-04-11) which solicits proposals for
typical CWM metadata interchange patterns. Auldenfire Sweden AB Contact Person: Data Distribution Service This RFP solicits proposals for an MDA specification describing the application-visible
interface and behavior of a Data-Distribution Service (DDS) that supports
a Data-Centric Publish-Subscribe (DCPS) for real-time systems and offers
optionally a Data Local Reconstruction Layer (DLRL). The MDA specification
should include how the application models data, how it interacts with
the middleware to describe the communication and QoS requirements, how
data is sent and received (relative to the QoS requirements), how the
applications access to it and the kinds of feedback the application gets
from the state of the middleware. Auldenfire Sweden AB Contact Person: Online Upgrades This Request for Information (RFI) solicits information on facilities
that permit the replacement of objects in systems without requiring the
system to go off-line, reboot, or similar actions that would make the
system unavailable for a lengthy period of time. Auldenfire Sweden AB Contact Person: Meta Object Facility 1.5 MOF - The MetaObject Facility standardizes a metamodel for object oriented
analysis and design, and a repository. (The CWM standardizes a metamodel
for data modeling) Because they are based on the MOF metamodel, UML models
can be freely passed from tool to tool using XMI - without the commonality
of definition provided by the MOF, this would not be practical. Auldenfire Sweden AB Contact Person: UML 2.0 Diagram Interchange RFP Unified Modeling Language 2.0 Diagram Interchange The Unified Modeling Language is a language for visualizing, specifying,
constructing and documenting the artifacts of software systems. It is
a general-purpose modeling language that can be used with all major object
and component methods and applied to all application domains. The OMG
adopted the UML 1.1 specification in November 1997. Since then UML Revision
Task Forces have produced several minor revisions, the most recent being
the UML 1.4 specification, which is to be adopted in early 2001. This
Request for Proposal (RFP) is the 4th in a series of RFPs under the UML
2.0 umbrella. The first three RFPs have already been issued and focus
on (a) UML Infrastructure (b) UML Superstructure and (c) OCL respectively.
Please see www.omg.org/technology/uml
for more information on OMG UML Auldenfire Sweden AB Contact Person: Unified Modeling Language 2.0 Superstructure This RFP solicits proposals for the following: Enable the modeling of
structural patterns, such as component-based development and the specification
of run-time architectures. Clarify the semantics of the generalization,
dependency, and association relationships. Support encapsulation and scalability
in behavioral modeling, in particular, for state machines and interactions.
Remove restrictions on activity graph modeling due to the mapping to state
machines. Auldenfire Sweden AB Contact Person: Unified Modeling Language Testing Profile To date, UML technology has focused primarily on the definition of system
structure and behavior. With the approach towards system engineering according
to model-driven architectures with automated code generation, the need
for solid conformance testing, certification and branding is increased.
However, UML provides limited means for describing test procedures within
UML. This RFP solicits proposals for the following: (1) A UML testing
profile based upon the UML metamodel or a MOF based meta-model for UML
testing. (2) That enables the specification of tests for structural (static)
and behavioral (dynamic) aspects of computational UML models, and (3)
That is capable of inter-operation with existing test technologies for
black box testing. Auldenfire Sweden AB Contact Person: Meta Object Facility 2.0 Extended Markup Language Metadata Interchange This Request for Proposal (RFP) is one of a series of RFPs related to
developing the next major revision of the OMG Meta Object Facility Specification,
which will be referred to as MOF 2.0. Some of the RFPs pertain to the
specification of the technology-neutral MOF itself, while others pertain
to mapping the MOF to specific implementation technologies. This RFP pertains
to updating XMI, the OMG's MOF-XML mapping. Meta Object Facility 2.0 Interface Definition Language This Request for Proposal (RFP) is one of a series of RFPs related to
developing the next major revision of the OMG Meta Object Facility specification,
which will be referred to as MOF 2.0. Some of the RFPs pertain to specifying
the technology neutral MOF itself, while others pertain to mapping the
MOF to specific implementation technologies. This RFP pertains to updating
the MOF to IDL mapping to be consistent with MOF 2.0 and to address specific
issues that were judged to be beyond the scope of MOF 1.x RTF (Ex: See
mandatory requirements 2,5 and 7) Meta Object Facility 2.0 Core This Request for Proposal (RFP) is one of a series of RFPs related to
developing the next major revision of the OMG Meta Object Facility specification,
which will be referred to as MOF 2.0. Some of the RFPs pertain to specifying
the technology neutral MOF itself, while others pertain to mapping the
MOF to specific implementation technologies. This RFP pertains to: 1.
The MOF meta-metamodel and its metadata management and interchange semantics
(for example the instance and extent management of MOF repositories) 2.
Reuse of the UML 2.0 Infrastructure. Workflow Process Definition RFP Workflow Process Definition This Request For Proposal solicits submissions that specify extensions
to UML specification. This RFP solicits proposals for the following: o
A metamodel and/or profile which extends UML for defining workflow processes.
o A standard for exporting and importing a Workflow Process Definition
from tools and repositories, and for exchanging a Workflow Process Definition
with other enactment domains. Competency Framework This RFP solicits proposals for standard interfaces for a competency
framework. A competency framework will include interfaces to do the following:
Support the maintenance of the metadata used to define the different types
of competencies available. This includes information about how a particular
kind of competency is rated, described, and compared to one another as
well as the distinct recognition of the difference between authorization
and privilege. Support the creation, categorization, and maintenance of
a set of competencies created from the metadata types described above.
Support the ability to create and maintain a set of competency evaluations
for something. A set of competency evaluations is something's rating or
score for a particular competency set (or subset). Support the ability
to do gap analysis between two competency evaluations. A gap analysis
is a numerical comparison that can be used to evaluate how closely one
competency evaluation is to another. Notification/JMS Interworking RFP OMG Notification Service - J2EE Java Message Service Interworking Standards The OMG standard for asynchronous publish-subscribe communications is
the Notification Service, while in the Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE)
standard, the Java Message Service (JMS) provides this capability. This
document solicits proposals to enable interworking between the two standards,
so that CORBA and Java objects (including EJB's) can communicate with
each other asynchronously. This RFP solicits proposals for the following:
Mappings between Notification and JMS message types. Reconciliation between
the different qualities of service (QoS) provided by the Notification
Service and JMS. Ability to maintain transactional message contexts across
JMS and the Notification Service. Implementations which facilitate end-to-end
messaging between Notification and JMS.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2001 - 2007 Aurenav LLC - e-mail: info@auldenfire.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||